Today we reported that the United Nations scolded the UK for passing a public order law aimed at quelling road blockades (a tactic, we noted, favored by environmental activists). We rarely find ourselves siding with globalist institutions, but in this case, we find ourselves siding with the UN, albeit for different reasons.
According to The Daily Mail,
Under current laws, protesters need to be deemed to be causing ‘serious disruption’ for officers to intervene – but police chiefs are given no definition of what this actually means.
Deputy assistant commissioner Laurence Taylor, who is leading the Met’s response to the protests, revealed [Just Stop Oil activists] did not cross this threshold earlier in the week because activists spent only ‘about 15 minutes’ on the road.
This is absurd. What the police lack is not clarity on the existing laws, but the political will to enforce them. Certainly, given the overzealous response to silent prayer near abortion centres, the police know how to interpret laws broadly to effect the result they seek.
The UK does not need new laws. As the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said, “This law is wholly unnecessary as UK police already have the powers to act against violent and disruptive demonstrations.” We would take this further to say that no Western country needs new laws giving the government more power over freedom of association. Our experience with COVID makes this obvious. If the law is broken or ambiguous, fix it. But no law will be effective without the political will to enforce it.
The UK Lacks the Will, Not the Law
You may also like
Britain’s Christian Political Arms Race
The launch of Rupert Lowe’s Restore Britain party started a civil war with Reform UK for the loyalty of an emerging Christian voting bloc.
Theatre of the Absurd: Audiences Assaulting Fictional ‘Nazis’—On Stage and Off
Repeatedly and inaccurately—on stage, on-screen, and in the media—calling people ‘fascists’ who are in fact just perfectly ordinary people who happen to think differently can provoke unpleasant real-life consequences.
A Defeat for Suicide Campaigners Is a Victory for the Vulnerable
The rejection of the Scottish assisted suicide bill comes after cautionary tales from Canada, which is on track for 100,000 euthanasia deaths by this summer.
Today we reported that the United Nations scolded the UK for passing a public order law aimed at quelling road blockades (a tactic, we noted, favored by environmental activists). We rarely find ourselves siding with globalist institutions, but in this case, we find ourselves siding with the UN, albeit for different reasons.
According to The Daily Mail,
This is absurd. What the police lack is not clarity on the existing laws, but the political will to enforce them. Certainly, given the overzealous response to silent prayer near abortion centres, the police know how to interpret laws broadly to effect the result they seek.
The UK does not need new laws. As the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said, “This law is wholly unnecessary as UK police already have the powers to act against violent and disruptive demonstrations.” We would take this further to say that no Western country needs new laws giving the government more power over freedom of association. Our experience with COVID makes this obvious. If the law is broken or ambiguous, fix it. But no law will be effective without the political will to enforce it.
Our community starts with you
READ NEXT
A Defeat for Suicide Campaigners Is a Victory for the Vulnerable
Danish Political Pragmatism Challenged by Rising Polarization
Switzerland’s Cash Enshrinement in the Constitution Is a Win for Liberty