
ECJ Falls In Line with Brussels’ Progressive Agenda Again in New Migration Ruling
The court’s decision directly challenges national-level practices that have allowed member states to streamline asylum procedures based on lists of “safe countries.”

The court’s decision directly challenges national-level practices that have allowed member states to streamline asylum procedures based on lists of “safe countries.”

“There is the danger that even those who are ‘successfully’ removed from the continent are later able to come back anyway.”

After years of blocking tougher migration rules, Brussels’ establishment scrambles to copy the very policies it condemned.
The move is expected to make deportations easier and cut the number of asylum applications.

The plan doesn’t come from a genuine desire to fix illegal migration; the establishment sees it as a way to prevent populists from gaining more ground over the issue.

Von der Leyen’s Commission had to realize it can no longer ignore member states’ sovereign right to control their borders, nor their legitimate demand for tougher migration reforms.

The Italian government will introduce electronic tracking for migrants and turn its offshore centers into repatriation hubs, sidestepping judicial roadblocks.

“If some judges want to govern, they should run for elections,” PM Meloni said while the judiciary boasts about not obeying her government’s new rules.