
Borrell’s U.S. Broadside Reveals the EU Elite’s Post-National Turn
The clash with the United States acts as a catalyst for an internal struggle: who really defines what Europe is and should be?

The clash with the United States acts as a catalyst for an internal struggle: who really defines what Europe is and should be?

The document marks a sharp shift in tone from the United States, raising questions about Brussels’ direction and its ability to manage the continent’s growing crises.

Orbán argues that the EU’s political elite is using the war in Ukraine as a pretext to accelerate a federalist project that restricts national sovereignty.

The EU Commission’s proposal for the next multiannual financial framework hides a political revolution in plain sight.

The European Commission unveils two flagship defense projects amid growing concerns over funding and political control.

Under the banner of security, the European Commission moves toward a military integration that many member states firmly reject.

Germany’s integration push, framed as efficiency, masks a deeper cost: growing supranational control at the expense of national economic autonomy.

The proposal would strengthen Brussels’ power over the member states while weakening the Union’s internal plurality.

Brussels’ version of unity always means centralization—and a transfer of responsibility from national governments to unelected bureaucrats.

Although the report details the technical aspects of the April 28 collapse with great precision, it avoids naming those responsible for it.