“Established Media Have Fallen for the Potsdam Narrative and Reported It As Fact”: An Interview With Ulrich Vosgerau
Why hasn’t the media revolted against Correctiv? They’ve fooled everyone, and now it’s costing them dearly.
Why hasn’t the media revolted against Correctiv? They’ve fooled everyone, and now it’s costing them dearly.
Participants were wrongly accused of discussing the deportation of German citizens of foreign origin.
AfD’s legal representative says left-wing media dreamed up the Potsdam plot.
A court recently ruled Correctiv was spreading false claims—exactly what the outlet is supposed to guard against with its AI-based ‘fact-checking’ project.
Contrary to what Correctiv’s article claimed, AfD’s Alice Weidel rejected any idea of “withdrawing nationality from people who have acquired it on the grounds that they are of foreign origin.”
The undisclosed meetings with, and financial support from, the German government raise serious doubts about the media outlet’s self-described ‘independence.’
Political dissidents on the Right would face limitations on their ability to serve in government jobs and leave and enter their country.
Meetings began in 2020 with the aim of battling COVID ‘disinformation’—that is, information contradicting the state’s edicts.
Publicly-financed, politically-biased Correctiv keeps backtracking on its accusations against AfD.
Doubts raised about truth of report that sparked calls to ban the insurgent right-wing party
To submit a pitch for consideration:
submissions@
For subscription inquiries:
subscriptions@