
Parents in Firing Line as EU Debates ‘Conversion Practices’ Ban
Concerns are growing that the undefined scope of “conversion practices” could capture therapy, guidance, and even private conversations at home.

Concerns are growing that the undefined scope of “conversion practices” could capture therapy, guidance, and even private conversations at home.

The combination of control of funds, digital rules, and legal procedures allows the EU to sway the political context ahead of elections in member states.

The conservative think tank’s researchers say claims of Russian interference in Hungary are “cynical, hypocritical, and dangerous.”

The initiative has sparked concern among those who believe open dialogue and psychological support are important to explore complex emotions safely.

Speakers at a Budapest conference argued that former U.S. and current EU funding programmes overtly promote progressive causes instead of traditional development goals.

Forcing X, formerly Twitter, to release data for elections enables the EU-backed civil society groups to scrutinize sensitive information—prompting national sovereignty concerns.

Event attendees will gain practical insights into goal setting, risk calculation, and mastering high-stress situations.

The project seeks to protect democracy, ensure genuine accountability, and safeguard free expression across Europe.

Those pushing for a ban are not being open about what constitutes a ‘conversion practice.’

MCC Brussels criticized the NGO behind the lawsuit, calling its demand and the legal action a “foreign power grab” rather than a move for transparency.