
EU Council Considers Deploying ‘Military Advisors’ to Ukraine
Brussels is talking about a ceasefire while hindering negotiations with a new set of “fanatic pro-war initiatives.”
Brussels is talking about a ceasefire while hindering negotiations with a new set of “fanatic pro-war initiatives.”
MEP Borvendég called for parliament to condemn atrocities by both sides in the Russo-Ukraine war.
“We are ready to exert more pressure on Russia using all available instruments,” declared the Madrid meeting’s final communiqué. But how?
The Paris conference wants to do without the United States—but not without their armed forces.
It is not enough to lament and proclaim that, in an ideal world, the aggressor must be defeated, because geopolitics is not a childish game of good versus evil.
A proposed €20 billion in military aid was quietly removed from the EU summit draft—to the relief of many.
Suppose the Brussels elite prolonged the war and no one came?
What are European nations, whose moral support for the Ukrainian cause is undeniable, prepared to sacrifice to continue backing Kyiv?
The deal, centered on resource-sharing, could reshape global power dynamics.
Even if the EU manages to give a decisive response, the question would still linger: with what purpose, under what values, and to what end?