Today we reported that the United Nations scolded the UK for passing a public order law aimed at quelling road blockades (a tactic, we noted, favored by environmental activists). We rarely find ourselves siding with globalist institutions, but in this case, we find ourselves siding with the UN, albeit for different reasons.
According to The Daily Mail,
Under current laws, protesters need to be deemed to be causing ‘serious disruption’ for officers to intervene – but police chiefs are given no definition of what this actually means.
Deputy assistant commissioner Laurence Taylor, who is leading the Met’s response to the protests, revealed [Just Stop Oil activists] did not cross this threshold earlier in the week because activists spent only ‘about 15 minutes’ on the road.
This is absurd. What the police lack is not clarity on the existing laws, but the political will to enforce them. Certainly, given the overzealous response to silent prayer near abortion centres, the police know how to interpret laws broadly to effect the result they seek.
The UK does not need new laws. As the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said, “This law is wholly unnecessary as UK police already have the powers to act against violent and disruptive demonstrations.” We would take this further to say that no Western country needs new laws giving the government more power over freedom of association. Our experience with COVID makes this obvious. If the law is broken or ambiguous, fix it. But no law will be effective without the political will to enforce it.
The UK Lacks the Will, Not the Law
You may also like
The Illusion of a Left Without Woke
Susan Neiman is right to challenge the excesses of identity politics—but wrong to treat them as an alien intrusion. The ideas behind today’s politics of identity grew from within the Left itself, raising a deeper question about whether it can escape the intellectual path that led it here.
Vatican–China Contentious Accord: How the Holy See Is Appeasing a Communist Regime
By continuing the agreement with the CCP, the Vatican is essentially supporting its distortion of religious practices and is perilously nearing complicity in the escalating human rights violations within the country.
Ethnic Memory: Why Societies Should Be Monoethnic
Multiculturalists who dismiss concerns about Islamic or African immigration by comparing them with past hostility to Irish, Italian, or Slavic immigrants overlook the vast differences in ethnic memory and cultural distance that can make integration more difficult.
Today we reported that the United Nations scolded the UK for passing a public order law aimed at quelling road blockades (a tactic, we noted, favored by environmental activists). We rarely find ourselves siding with globalist institutions, but in this case, we find ourselves siding with the UN, albeit for different reasons.
According to The Daily Mail,
This is absurd. What the police lack is not clarity on the existing laws, but the political will to enforce them. Certainly, given the overzealous response to silent prayer near abortion centres, the police know how to interpret laws broadly to effect the result they seek.
The UK does not need new laws. As the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights said, “This law is wholly unnecessary as UK police already have the powers to act against violent and disruptive demonstrations.” We would take this further to say that no Western country needs new laws giving the government more power over freedom of association. Our experience with COVID makes this obvious. If the law is broken or ambiguous, fix it. But no law will be effective without the political will to enforce it.
Our community starts with you
READ NEXT
Sudan’s War Has More Than One Supply Line—Europe Must Confront Them All
How Trump Loyalists Are Taking Over American Media
Vatican–China Contentious Accord: How the Holy See Is Appeasing a Communist Regime