Labour doesn’t want to get into government for the sake of holding power—it wants to radically transform the country. Leader Sir Keir Starmer has been quite open about this, even if he hasn’t been clear about what exactly he intends to change.
Starmer said earlier this week—and not for the first time—that he hopes to spend at least 10 years as UK prime minister, during which time he will implement “fundamental” reforms.
A decade indicates how long I think it’s going to take for the fundamental change which will see a country transformed, and that years later people will be able to look back and say, “that was a real game-changing government.”
His party’s manifesto doesn’t say much about what shape this transformation might take. But what we do know of Labour’s plans—to irreversibly remove large quantities of Parliament’s power and hand it to bodies filled with more Leftists—is bad enough. Likewise, cranking the green agenda up to 11 and making it easier to change gender. So too is what we know about Starmer’s political past (and, crucially, present).
Hence a warning from eminent historian David Starkey at an event in London earlier this month regarding Labour’s “determination to create a one-party state”—one ruled, Mail on Sunday columnist Peter Hitchens adds, by “the most Left wing government this country has ever had.”
Yet most of Labour’s opponents still appear not to have grasped any of this. It makes sense for Nigel Farage and Reform to play down the threat of Labour—to say that Starmer and his team are only in it “for their careers”—so as to not scare supporters into voting Conservative in order to limit Labour’s power.
But why—unless, as many are increasingly, half-jokingly suggesting, they actually want to lose the election—are the Conservatives not using these points to their advantage? Despite all that is known about Starmer’s programme, prime minister Rishi Sunak continues to trot out the line—as predictable as it is false—that his opponent has “no plan.” He’d be much wiser to make it absolutely clear that Starmer does have a plan, and that nobody (save for a few radical establishment types) wants to see it put through.
After 14 years of betrayal, this is the one argument that the Tories have going for them. And they’re too dimwitted to realise it.
UK: Believe Starmer When He Says He Wants To “Transform” the Country
Photo: Phil Noble / POOL / AFP
You may also like
Gender Quotas: The Wrong Answer to the Wrong Question
The hollow claim that a quota would enhance democratic representation is glaring in light of the systematic exclusion of the right-populist AfD.
Munich Security Conference 2026: the Valentine’s Day That Feels Like an Audit
In security policy, ‘commitment issues’ are measured in capabilities, not flowers, and Europe must choose between relying on U.S. reassurance and building the capacity to stand on its own.
Why is the UK Government Killing the Countryside?
As long as there’s a settled, traditional people with deep roots and connectedness to the landscape, it will be observed that there always were indigenous peoples of these isles, and such an observation is unacceptable to the progressive project of our political class.
Labour doesn’t want to get into government for the sake of holding power—it wants to radically transform the country. Leader Sir Keir Starmer has been quite open about this, even if he hasn’t been clear about what exactly he intends to change.
Starmer said earlier this week—and not for the first time—that he hopes to spend at least 10 years as UK prime minister, during which time he will implement “fundamental” reforms.
His party’s manifesto doesn’t say much about what shape this transformation might take. But what we do know of Labour’s plans—to irreversibly remove large quantities of Parliament’s power and hand it to bodies filled with more Leftists—is bad enough. Likewise, cranking the green agenda up to 11 and making it easier to change gender. So too is what we know about Starmer’s political past (and, crucially, present).
Hence a warning from eminent historian David Starkey at an event in London earlier this month regarding Labour’s “determination to create a one-party state”—one ruled, Mail on Sunday columnist Peter Hitchens adds, by “the most Left wing government this country has ever had.”
Yet most of Labour’s opponents still appear not to have grasped any of this. It makes sense for Nigel Farage and Reform to play down the threat of Labour—to say that Starmer and his team are only in it “for their careers”—so as to not scare supporters into voting Conservative in order to limit Labour’s power.
But why—unless, as many are increasingly, half-jokingly suggesting, they actually want to lose the election—are the Conservatives not using these points to their advantage? Despite all that is known about Starmer’s programme, prime minister Rishi Sunak continues to trot out the line—as predictable as it is false—that his opponent has “no plan.” He’d be much wiser to make it absolutely clear that Starmer does have a plan, and that nobody (save for a few radical establishment types) wants to see it put through.
After 14 years of betrayal, this is the one argument that the Tories have going for them. And they’re too dimwitted to realise it.
Our community starts with you
READ NEXT
Reclaiming the Lenten Fast: A Sacred Return to Our True Identity in an Age of Emptiness
Is France Protecting Quentin’s Killers?
NATO 3.0: America’s Bold Reset