Leaked papers now suggest that Rishi Sunak, who promised to “restore trust” in the Conservative Party, was pulling a —largely unsuccessful—stunt to win popularity.
The prime minister never thought the Rwanda Plan, now his flagship policy to “stop the boats,” would work, according to documents seen by the BBC. The broadcaster reports that while serving as chancellor under Boris Johnson, Sunak had “significant doubts” about the plan to send illegal migrants to the central African nation for asylum processing such that he wanted to “scale [it] back.” In particular, he believed the “deterrent won’t work.”
Papers prepared in March 2022 say that while Johnson was trying to secure more funding for the scheme, the chancellor “wants to pursue smaller volumes initially, 500 [sent to Rwanda] instead of 1,500” in the first year and “3,000 instead of 5,000 in years two and three.”
His reservations did not stop there. When he stood for the Tory leadership, Sunak “wanted to scrap the Rwanda scheme” altogether, according to a campaign insider. The source told Sky News that the now-PM “had no serious interest” in illegal or legal migration “until he was persuaded otherwise during the campaign.”
Suella Braverman’s resignation letter last November would suggest that she was among the figures persuading Sunak to pursue the Rwanda Plan.
Reports make it clear that it is most likely the PM was convinced not that the scheme was good for the country but that supporting it would keep his more right-wing backbenchers happy.
Sunak has pushed back against this news, insisting that as chancellor he “scrutinised” all plans. But he has not denied considering axing the plan during his leadership bid.
Almost two years on from the creation of these documents, not a single illegal migrant has been deported to Rwanda. The Tories, as Labour likes to joke, have sent more home secretaries to the African state than Channel crossers.
In light of this new information, it is worth considering the possible reasons for this. It is possible that the policy is simply no good; that no amount of political will could get any planes off the ground. But the documents point to another possibility; that the Rwanda Plan hasn’t worked because those responsible for it never believed it could, and so never even tried.
Sunak’s equivocation echoes that of Boris Johnson. Few doubt that his backing of the 2016 Brexit campaign was less to do with his (at best) questionable commitment to Britain leaving the EU than with his thirst for leadership.
UK Prime Minister Never Believed the Rwanda Plan Would Work
Rishi Sunak
Photo: ComposedPix / Shutterstock.com
You may also like
Why is the UK Government Killing the Countryside?
As long as there’s a settled, traditional people with deep roots and connectedness to the landscape, it will be observed that there always were indigenous peoples of these isles, and such an observation is unacceptable to the progressive project of our political class.
The Limassol Carnival: A Living Tradition in a Changing Europe
As cities increasingly resemble one another and cultural influences circulate rapidly, local festivities like the Limassol Carnival serve as anchors of continuity and self-understanding.
Gender Quotas: The Wrong Answer to the Wrong Question
The hollow claim that a quota would enhance democratic representation is glaring in light of the systematic exclusion of the right-populist AfD.
Leaked papers now suggest that Rishi Sunak, who promised to “restore trust” in the Conservative Party, was pulling a —largely unsuccessful—stunt to win popularity.
The prime minister never thought the Rwanda Plan, now his flagship policy to “stop the boats,” would work, according to documents seen by the BBC. The broadcaster reports that while serving as chancellor under Boris Johnson, Sunak had “significant doubts” about the plan to send illegal migrants to the central African nation for asylum processing such that he wanted to “scale [it] back.” In particular, he believed the “deterrent won’t work.”
Papers prepared in March 2022 say that while Johnson was trying to secure more funding for the scheme, the chancellor “wants to pursue smaller volumes initially, 500 [sent to Rwanda] instead of 1,500” in the first year and “3,000 instead of 5,000 in years two and three.”
His reservations did not stop there. When he stood for the Tory leadership, Sunak “wanted to scrap the Rwanda scheme” altogether, according to a campaign insider. The source told Sky News that the now-PM “had no serious interest” in illegal or legal migration “until he was persuaded otherwise during the campaign.”
Suella Braverman’s resignation letter last November would suggest that she was among the figures persuading Sunak to pursue the Rwanda Plan.
Reports make it clear that it is most likely the PM was convinced not that the scheme was good for the country but that supporting it would keep his more right-wing backbenchers happy.
Sunak has pushed back against this news, insisting that as chancellor he “scrutinised” all plans. But he has not denied considering axing the plan during his leadership bid.
Almost two years on from the creation of these documents, not a single illegal migrant has been deported to Rwanda. The Tories, as Labour likes to joke, have sent more home secretaries to the African state than Channel crossers.
In light of this new information, it is worth considering the possible reasons for this. It is possible that the policy is simply no good; that no amount of political will could get any planes off the ground. But the documents point to another possibility; that the Rwanda Plan hasn’t worked because those responsible for it never believed it could, and so never even tried.
Sunak’s equivocation echoes that of Boris Johnson. Few doubt that his backing of the 2016 Brexit campaign was less to do with his (at best) questionable commitment to Britain leaving the EU than with his thirst for leadership.
Our community starts with you
READ NEXT
The Limassol Carnival: A Living Tradition in a Changing Europe
UPDATE: Meta Reinstates Our Facebook Page After Suspending It
Britain’s Double Standard on Extremism