Italy’s Parliament has approved a sweeping new security law backed by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, introducing tougher penalties for squatters, protestors, and those who attack police. The bill, passed in the Senate on Wednesday with 109 votes in favor and 69 against, has sparked fierce debate across the political spectrum.
Among the most significant changes is a new offence for the unlawful occupation of property, allowing the eviction of squatters without a court order in some instances. Offenders could face up to seven years in prison—a response to a problem that has plagued many Italian cities and frustrated both private owners and local authorities. Without a doubt, this is a firm step in defense of private property—a fundamental principle in any functioning democracy and a necessary condition for a healthy real estate market.
The law also criminalizes protest tactics involving roadblocks or urban disruptions, which are common among climate activist groups like Ultima Generazione. While this legislation may prove controversial, it reflects a broader European trend of pushing back against protests that sometimes paralyze entire cities. The balance between order and liberty is difficult, but legitimate protest should not be confused with organized sabotage.
Opposition to these measures has been loud. The Italian Left protested vehemently in Parliament, with shouts, sit-ins, and accusations of authoritarianism. More than 10,000 people took to the streets in Rome last weekend, chanting slogans about a “state of fear” and likening the government to previous authoritarian regimes. However, outside the media noise, the broader Italian public welcomes firmer action on issues that have long been ignored or tolerated for political convenience.
The reform also provides better support for the police: body cameras, financial assistance for legal expenses, and stricter penalties for assaults on public officials. It reaffirms that those tasked with enforcing the law have the support of the State—something that in recent years had become questionable.
Not everything in the decree is beyond criticism. The removal of some legal protections for pregnant women or mothers with young children deserves closer scrutiny. The government itself would do well to heed warnings about potential overreach in implementing these measures.
What is clear is that this law marks another quiet success for the Italian Right, which, without fuss or drama, continues advancing its agenda of security, law, and order. In an age when many governments drift without direction, this kind of clear, decisive policymaking is a rare display of political leadership.
