
Brussels and the Ballot Box: New Study Denounces EU Election Influence
The combination of control of funds, digital rules, and legal procedures allows the EU to sway the political context ahead of elections in member states.

The combination of control of funds, digital rules, and legal procedures allows the EU to sway the political context ahead of elections in member states.

A new EU system will track online content during the campaign, even as evidence of foreign interference remains absent.

The era of unregulated paid-for verification may be coming to an end in Europe as X attempts to align its platform with the requirements of the Digital Services Act.

Patriots for Europe say Brussels pressured tech firms to police political speech during elections.

The appeal marks the first courtroom battle over a penalty issued under the EU’s sweeping Digital Services Act.

The initiative raises uncomfortable questions for Brussels, which presents itself as a defender of rights abroad while regulating online platforms at home.

“No one denies that disinformation exists. The problem is that, in this case, the remedy may be worse than the disease.”

The GDI calls itself “independent”—but if it depends on funding from governments and public institutions like the European Commission, what kind of independence is that?

When electoral outcomes depend on conformity to approved narratives, voters are no longer citizens exercising constitutional rights—they are just pawns in a supervised process.

A U.S. report has reignited accusations that Brussels crossed from regulation into political control, with critics warning the implications reach far beyond one country.