Crowning History
The combination of continuity and change has always been central to the genius of coronations, reassuring us that the past is being honoured, yet reaffirming the new order of things.
The combination of continuity and change has always been central to the genius of coronations, reassuring us that the past is being honoured, yet reaffirming the new order of things.
The fact that demonstrating pride in one’s country is considered ‘fascist’ speaks to the utter insanity of the current ethos.
If the ‘M’ word is uttered, the malefactor’s hearers often reply: “So, you want to be a lord or something? If we had a monarchy again, you’d be nothing!” My favourite response: “What makes you think I’m something now? Do you think the chancellor cares if you or I live or die?”
The tricouleur now seems to represent the empty promises of a failed experiment that has gone on for too long.
“Germany ceased to have Kings when the Germans ceased to be a Kingly people.” Such could be said of any nation in Europe, or her daughter nations across the seas. Let us pray and work to deserve better than the rulers we now have.
King Charles said he was particularly pleased that celebrations were “as happy, safe and enjoyable as possible.”
Despite worries that the coronation ceremony would be riddled with modernist innovations, it proved remarkably in keeping with tradition.
While the world watches the coronation of the new King of the United Kingdom and the 14 commonwealth realms, on the other side of Europe some will be thinking about the disappearance of their own monarchical traditions.
The Princess Royal’s reference to the “genuine benefits” provided by the monarchy indicates she is not worried about its future.
One reason why we forget that the ideal of monarchy expressed in the British coronation rite was once the ideal of all Europe. The ideal has survived no-where else.