
Sovereignty Under Siege: The Implications of WHO’s Pandemic Proposals
The outcome of the next World Health Assembly will be an historic turning point in the conflict between global health governance and national sovereignty.

The outcome of the next World Health Assembly will be an historic turning point in the conflict between global health governance and national sovereignty.

World Health Organization chief Tedros Ghebreyesus said the outcome did not mean failure and that he would still “try everything” to “make this happen.”

Former Brexit Party leader urges Britain to leave the WHO rather than comply with enforced measures, as EU nations resist the power grab.

If no proof is delivered before noon on November 30th, the MEPs will declare the amendments “null and void.”

A nanny-state approach to nicotine policy undermines democracy and transparency.

Global framework would create mandatory pandemic regulations for all UN member states

New guidance by the WHO advises Aspartame should not be used for weight loss, and warns that it may lead to increased risk of diabetes, heart disease, and early death in adults—criticisms usually associated with sugar.

The EU Commission is funding the large-scale production of vaccines at four pharmaceutical companies.

Reading like a draft law, the report claims discrimination cannot apply to the legal age of consent.

Van Houwelingen called on other conservative, populist, anti-globalist parties across Europe to follow the example of FvD and work to block the treaty change.