The Democratic Presidential nominee is an imposter. Despite her efforts and the efforts of her campaign staff, she neither embodies nor champions the American dream. Vice President Harris is representative of a privileged global class that is hostile to the interests of most citizens, and which actively degrades their standard of living and well-being.
The Kamala Harris story is unrecognizable to most Americans. The nominee is the child of international professionals. Her parents arrived in America to pursue advanced graduate degrees, study at a prestigious university, and work at elite universities. Harris spent most of her childhood in radical Berkeley, California and the affluent, English-speaking Montreal neighborhood of Westmount. The ultra-liberal circles of San Francisco facilitated her professional rise. These are bastions for elites who thrive on privilege, progressivism, and power.
Berkeley, Montreal, and San Francisco ingratiated Harris into the globalist ethos. These elite environments introduced and nurtured aggressive secularism, radical egalitarianism and environmentalism, rapacious individualism, and multiculturalism. They foment an unraveling of social cohesion, a disregard for boundaries, and an indifference to popular sovereignty. The privileged communities of Harris’ youth and professional life have been critical to cultivating a Democratic presidential nominee who struggles to connect with a vast majority of Americans. She exudes entitlement, privileges the interests of the few over the many, thumbs her nose at large swaths of the country, revels in a multiplicity of identities, and indulges in the hollowing out of belief systems which are millennia old.
The globalist ethos embodied by Vice President Harris has wreaked havoc on the American dream for 30 years and counting. Globalists push that dream further out of reach for growing numbers in the name of efficient supply chains, corporate profits, shareholders, foreigners, and the environment. Progressivism’s vapid notions of justice and equality belittle and gut American security and opportunity. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are themselves marginalizers—of hard work, innovation, and merit—while also being incubators for the dissolution of social cohesion.
The Democratic presidential nominee is intent on executing this globalist-infused agenda and shredding whatever remains of the American social fabric. As a high priestess of globalism, Harris will build upon what she believes, knows, and has done—continuing the disruption of the economy, a subversion of governance, and the redefinition of culture. Her election to the presidency would increase division, disparity, despair, and dislocation.
The vice president adds insult to the injury inflicted on many Americans by globalization. Harris’ celebration of an open border and the unimpeded flow of migrants (outside of election season, anyway) is a gut punch to people and communities already ravaged by the globalist zeal for cheap labor and lower production costs. Once-thriving areas in America are now little more than ghost towns and empty buildings, because companies have moved their operations overseas.
That outsourcing makes it hard for Americans even to make ends meet, because the federal government and the “nonprofits” that it handsomely bankrolls subsidize aliens living on U.S. soil. The services and resources of their communities are overwhelmed and overextended by a massive influx of aliens. This occurs while those communities cope with rising rents, out-of-reach down payments for homes, and skyrocketing utilities and food prices.
Kamala Harris often speaks of “being unburdened by what has been.” Her words ring hollow here. It is her actions that do the talking. Harris’ globalist ethos piles one burden upon another for non-elites. Her policies do not create opportunity; they prolong nightmares. Even in the heavily Democratic state of Massachusetts, the effete community of Martha’s Vineyard can shun the burdens of globalism—and deport illegal migrants from their island—while the burdens of accommodating illegals are imposed on more challenged and under-resourced areas like nearby Roxbury.
The Democratic nominee’s globalist-infused understanding of governance benefits few while imposing costs on many. Harris and her peers are more concerned about feelings, virtue signaling, and utopias than facilitating true opportunity for citizens. Governance in Harris’ home state of California is a perfect example.
California’s infatuation with environmental justice supersedes assisting residents in achieving the American dream. The opportunity to own a home is denied to growing numbers, including the middle class. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has made housing developments cost-prohibitive. CEQA empowers environmental groups to tie up developers in the courts for years, requiring them to expend millions in legal fees before they can even begin building—if they are victorious. Kamala Harris’ promise to gift $25K for first-time house buyers will be another empty gesture for Californians.
California’s progressive approach to crime impedes business and diminishes quality of life. Harris ally Governor Gavin Newsom, and progressive District Attorneys like the Harris-endorsed George Gascon, have unleashed a wave of crime on urban areas in order to achieve “opportunity” and “true” justice. Their attempt to reduce incarceration has created a society with little deterrence or repercussion for evil. Harris’ allies have reclassified serious offenses as misdemeanors, eliminated cash bail, and reduced sentences for those preying on vulnerable Californians.
As is the case with the globalist environmental protection measures, when it comes to handling crime, it is the middle and working classes who are the victims. Recent, legal immigrants trying to realize the American dream witness the pillaging of their 7-Elevens and gas stations with little recourse. Harris offers them little thanks for waiting in line, sometimes for years, to pursue the American dream. She expects these same citizens to fight climate change despite putting their lives at risk daily due to lawlessness on city buses and subways. These developments do not faze Kamala Harris and her globalist peers in their posh LA neighborhood of Brentwood who can afford to never subject themselves to public transportation.
The vice president also represents a globalist class that abhors the profound embracing of culture, religion, and national identity by the masses. It impedes their realization of a universal secular society—progressive, superficially diverse, and unbounded. To overcome this obstacle, Harris and her peers entitle themselves in shallow exhibitions of identity, culture, and religion for the purposes of hollowing it out and accelerating their objectives.
They promote identity through nonsensical slogans like “unity through diversity” or “diversity is our strength.” Their celebration of religion is so sterilized and picked apart that it resembles little more than secularism garbed in the thinnest religious veneer. As Russ Douthat of the NYT has mentioned, they prefer a “liberal Christianity without Christ.”
Kamala Harris is quite adept in performing this exhibition. She is a shape-shifter—she moves from one identity to another—when circumstances necessitate it. To paraphrase Bert Cooper from the TV series Mad Men: “The woman is whatever room she is in.”
Look no further than the vice president’s recent employment of accents. Despite having never lived in the South or a Hispanic community, she feels entitled to invoke their regional accents when speaking before an audience in Atlanta or the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Leadership Conference. Should we expect the vice president to use a Chinese accent to ‘charm’ Chinese-Americans? Or would that be a bigoted act?
Harris’ shape shifting extends beyond the vocalization of words. The vice president goes through the motions of religious celebrations as though they amounted to sending a gratuitous Hallmark card. Sporadically, she publicly shares media of her celebrations of Hanukkah, Christmas, and Diwali. She wants to be everything and, in the process, predictably, embodies nothing herself.
For the Democratic nominee, celebrating Christmas is acceptable. Believing and upholding fundamental Christian beliefs is a different story. As a California Senator, Harris questioned several members of the Knights of the Columbus, a Catholic fraternal organization, about whether they were fit to serve in the government because of their views on marriage and abortion. The former prosecutor is not concerned about judicial philosophies or even, as she would have you believe, leaving others alone; she seeks a removal of all vestiges of Christian moorings from American society. It is an objective that is an affront to tens of millions of Americans. It also speaks volumes about the superficiality of the diversity promulgated by progressives.
The advancement of identity politics eats at America’s national cohesion. The sterilization of culture and religion renders community membership meaningless. Unlike most Americans, Kamala Harris, by the nature of her upbringing, professional experience, and wealth does not pay the price of division, dislocation, and alienation.
Kamala Harris is not who she claims to be. The vice president is not the product of the American Dream nor is she a believer in it. Her story of international privilege and her behavior make a mockery of it. The former senator is not a promoter of opportunity and security. She impedes and denies it. The Democratic presidential nominee does not uphold American ideals and values. She defiles them. Kamala Harris is a globalist.
Kamala Harris: Globalist
The Democratic Presidential nominee is an imposter. Despite her efforts and the efforts of her campaign staff, she neither embodies nor champions the American dream. Vice President Harris is representative of a privileged global class that is hostile to the interests of most citizens, and which actively degrades their standard of living and well-being.
The Kamala Harris story is unrecognizable to most Americans. The nominee is the child of international professionals. Her parents arrived in America to pursue advanced graduate degrees, study at a prestigious university, and work at elite universities. Harris spent most of her childhood in radical Berkeley, California and the affluent, English-speaking Montreal neighborhood of Westmount. The ultra-liberal circles of San Francisco facilitated her professional rise. These are bastions for elites who thrive on privilege, progressivism, and power.
Berkeley, Montreal, and San Francisco ingratiated Harris into the globalist ethos. These elite environments introduced and nurtured aggressive secularism, radical egalitarianism and environmentalism, rapacious individualism, and multiculturalism. They foment an unraveling of social cohesion, a disregard for boundaries, and an indifference to popular sovereignty. The privileged communities of Harris’ youth and professional life have been critical to cultivating a Democratic presidential nominee who struggles to connect with a vast majority of Americans. She exudes entitlement, privileges the interests of the few over the many, thumbs her nose at large swaths of the country, revels in a multiplicity of identities, and indulges in the hollowing out of belief systems which are millennia old.
The globalist ethos embodied by Vice President Harris has wreaked havoc on the American dream for 30 years and counting. Globalists push that dream further out of reach for growing numbers in the name of efficient supply chains, corporate profits, shareholders, foreigners, and the environment. Progressivism’s vapid notions of justice and equality belittle and gut American security and opportunity. Diversity, equity, and inclusion are themselves marginalizers—of hard work, innovation, and merit—while also being incubators for the dissolution of social cohesion.
The Democratic presidential nominee is intent on executing this globalist-infused agenda and shredding whatever remains of the American social fabric. As a high priestess of globalism, Harris will build upon what she believes, knows, and has done—continuing the disruption of the economy, a subversion of governance, and the redefinition of culture. Her election to the presidency would increase division, disparity, despair, and dislocation.
The vice president adds insult to the injury inflicted on many Americans by globalization. Harris’ celebration of an open border and the unimpeded flow of migrants (outside of election season, anyway) is a gut punch to people and communities already ravaged by the globalist zeal for cheap labor and lower production costs. Once-thriving areas in America are now little more than ghost towns and empty buildings, because companies have moved their operations overseas.
That outsourcing makes it hard for Americans even to make ends meet, because the federal government and the “nonprofits” that it handsomely bankrolls subsidize aliens living on U.S. soil. The services and resources of their communities are overwhelmed and overextended by a massive influx of aliens. This occurs while those communities cope with rising rents, out-of-reach down payments for homes, and skyrocketing utilities and food prices.
Kamala Harris often speaks of “being unburdened by what has been.” Her words ring hollow here. It is her actions that do the talking. Harris’ globalist ethos piles one burden upon another for non-elites. Her policies do not create opportunity; they prolong nightmares. Even in the heavily Democratic state of Massachusetts, the effete community of Martha’s Vineyard can shun the burdens of globalism—and deport illegal migrants from their island—while the burdens of accommodating illegals are imposed on more challenged and under-resourced areas like nearby Roxbury.
The Democratic nominee’s globalist-infused understanding of governance benefits few while imposing costs on many. Harris and her peers are more concerned about feelings, virtue signaling, and utopias than facilitating true opportunity for citizens. Governance in Harris’ home state of California is a perfect example.
California’s infatuation with environmental justice supersedes assisting residents in achieving the American dream. The opportunity to own a home is denied to growing numbers, including the middle class. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has made housing developments cost-prohibitive. CEQA empowers environmental groups to tie up developers in the courts for years, requiring them to expend millions in legal fees before they can even begin building—if they are victorious. Kamala Harris’ promise to gift $25K for first-time house buyers will be another empty gesture for Californians.
California’s progressive approach to crime impedes business and diminishes quality of life. Harris ally Governor Gavin Newsom, and progressive District Attorneys like the Harris-endorsed George Gascon, have unleashed a wave of crime on urban areas in order to achieve “opportunity” and “true” justice. Their attempt to reduce incarceration has created a society with little deterrence or repercussion for evil. Harris’ allies have reclassified serious offenses as misdemeanors, eliminated cash bail, and reduced sentences for those preying on vulnerable Californians.
As is the case with the globalist environmental protection measures, when it comes to handling crime, it is the middle and working classes who are the victims. Recent, legal immigrants trying to realize the American dream witness the pillaging of their 7-Elevens and gas stations with little recourse. Harris offers them little thanks for waiting in line, sometimes for years, to pursue the American dream. She expects these same citizens to fight climate change despite putting their lives at risk daily due to lawlessness on city buses and subways. These developments do not faze Kamala Harris and her globalist peers in their posh LA neighborhood of Brentwood who can afford to never subject themselves to public transportation.
The vice president also represents a globalist class that abhors the profound embracing of culture, religion, and national identity by the masses. It impedes their realization of a universal secular society—progressive, superficially diverse, and unbounded. To overcome this obstacle, Harris and her peers entitle themselves in shallow exhibitions of identity, culture, and religion for the purposes of hollowing it out and accelerating their objectives.
They promote identity through nonsensical slogans like “unity through diversity” or “diversity is our strength.” Their celebration of religion is so sterilized and picked apart that it resembles little more than secularism garbed in the thinnest religious veneer. As Russ Douthat of the NYT has mentioned, they prefer a “liberal Christianity without Christ.”
Kamala Harris is quite adept in performing this exhibition. She is a shape-shifter—she moves from one identity to another—when circumstances necessitate it. To paraphrase Bert Cooper from the TV series Mad Men: “The woman is whatever room she is in.”
Look no further than the vice president’s recent employment of accents. Despite having never lived in the South or a Hispanic community, she feels entitled to invoke their regional accents when speaking before an audience in Atlanta or the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Leadership Conference. Should we expect the vice president to use a Chinese accent to ‘charm’ Chinese-Americans? Or would that be a bigoted act?
Harris’ shape shifting extends beyond the vocalization of words. The vice president goes through the motions of religious celebrations as though they amounted to sending a gratuitous Hallmark card. Sporadically, she publicly shares media of her celebrations of Hanukkah, Christmas, and Diwali. She wants to be everything and, in the process, predictably, embodies nothing herself.
For the Democratic nominee, celebrating Christmas is acceptable. Believing and upholding fundamental Christian beliefs is a different story. As a California Senator, Harris questioned several members of the Knights of the Columbus, a Catholic fraternal organization, about whether they were fit to serve in the government because of their views on marriage and abortion. The former prosecutor is not concerned about judicial philosophies or even, as she would have you believe, leaving others alone; she seeks a removal of all vestiges of Christian moorings from American society. It is an objective that is an affront to tens of millions of Americans. It also speaks volumes about the superficiality of the diversity promulgated by progressives.
The advancement of identity politics eats at America’s national cohesion. The sterilization of culture and religion renders community membership meaningless. Unlike most Americans, Kamala Harris, by the nature of her upbringing, professional experience, and wealth does not pay the price of division, dislocation, and alienation.
Kamala Harris is not who she claims to be. The vice president is not the product of the American Dream nor is she a believer in it. Her story of international privilege and her behavior make a mockery of it. The former senator is not a promoter of opportunity and security. She impedes and denies it. The Democratic presidential nominee does not uphold American ideals and values. She defiles them. Kamala Harris is a globalist.
READ NEXT
Guarantee of Unhappiness
Are Net Zero’s Days Numbered?
Erdogan’s Hour of Triumph