In line with the scenario anticipated by the authorities, PSG’s victory in the Champions League final led to scenes of rare violence in Paris and across France. The images circulating on social media paint a picture of a situation spiralling out of control, a fact borne out by the official figures on police interventions. Yet politicians from the Left to the centre are seeking at all costs to downplay the situation, whilst fundamental questions arise: are we still at the stage of mere ‘disturbance of public order,’ or are we facing a collapse of civilisation?
The Champions League final pitted the French team Paris Saint-Germain against the English team Arsenal. While the match took place in Budapest in a relatively calm atmosphere, in Paris, residents held their breath and holed up in their homes. Families instructed children and teenagers to stay at home—there was no question of risking a trip to a café to watch the match, at the risk of getting into trouble.
PSG claimed victory once again, but the outcome was far from glorious. Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez reported a sharp rise in violence. Over 890 arrests were recorded, and 178 police officers and gendarmes were injured. Two deaths have been reported. Speaking on France Inter radio on Monday, June 1st, he stated that these figures were “up by more than 45%” compared to 2025.
In the heart of Paris, at the Opéra Bastille, audience members attending a performance were confined inside after the show, as security staff deemed that conditions on the street were not safe enough to allow them to leave the building. At the Trocadéro, a stone’s throw from the Eiffel Tower, rioters shouted “Bin Laden” while dressed in outfits imitating the terrorist. Online, accounts are flooding in and converging, such as that of this distraught firefighter:
I saw police colleagues being beaten with iron bars. I saw a police car pelted with stones just as we were coming out to put out a fire that was threatening families. We were attacked by rioters who were shouting at us, calling us ‘dogs.’ We were just trying to save lives, and we became targets.
I picked up a 14-year-old boy, his face covered in blood, who was crying and saying he’d followed ‘the older ones’ just to ‘have some fun.’ I saw a mother, with her shutters closed, begging us to protect her children while everything was being smashed down below. Shattered shop windows, looted shops, burnt-out cars… all under the pretext of “celebrating” something.
Elon Musk himself shared a glimpse of this violence on his X account.
The images circulated by individuals and alternative sites leave little doubt about the frenzied atmosphere that reigned over the city.
8,000 police officers were deployed in Paris alone. Among left-wing figures, denial of reality is rife, for quite understandable reasons: it is ideologically unthinkable to ‘stigmatise’ those responsible, their own voters. The obvious scapegoat is the police, accused of having cracked down indiscriminately or, at the very least, of not having allowed the supporters to ‘express their joy.’ In the centre and in the mainstream press, the narrative is the same. Despite the alarming figures, the minister refuses to use the term ‘chaos.’ The rolling news channel BFM TV simply referred to “a few tensions.”
Denial of reality has become systematic, echoed at the highest levels, as a police officer from the Paris region confided to Valeurs actuelles:
Few arrests. On these nights, we try not to make any so as not to overload the investigative services, even though we know the magistrates won’t follow up and will release those arrested without any punishment…
This is confirmed in his analysis by RN MP Matthias Renault: the rioters act this way because they have no fear, either of physical consequences or of legal or financial repercussions.
The French have been forced to adapt and get used to the wave of violence that now inevitably accompanies major football competitions.
For it is not ‘sport’ in general that is at issue here. The Rugby World Cup did not give rise to such madness, nor did the swimming competitions during the Olympic Games. This is a problem specific to football, which can be explained by the role immigration has come to play in the sport—at all levels. In regional clubs, ‘white’ players, or those of French descent, are now in the minority, to the extent that some parents are reluctant to let their children join teams where they will not be welcome. In the public sphere, few dare to speak out against this scandal, which is being endured in silence. At a higher level, players in local teams have only a very tenuous attachment to France, and many hold dual nationality with a country in sub-Saharan Africa or the Maghreb, as was implicitly demonstrated by the composition of the teams during the Africa Cup of Nations: a majority of African players with French nationality—or the reverse. The prestigious Paris Saint-Germain club, which headlined Saturday’s match, is owned by Qatar, which is advancing its agenda through football and maintains murky ties with the Muslim Brotherhood.
A few symbolic facts provide a key to understanding that some refuse to see. For instance, the son of the raï singer Khaled was photographed climbing onto the statue of Joan of Arc near the Louvre, to insult France in no uncertain terms—this is an example of a scene of ‘jubilation’ praised by the press. In his case, we are not dealing with a young man from a ‘deprived’ neighbourhood. Rather, this behaviour is symbolic of a youth that has learnt to hate France and which sees in the triumph of PSG—owned by Qatar and featuring North African and African star players—‘its’ triumph, the triumph of a France that has been replaced.
Given the political patterns currently in force, there is no reason why the situation should improve in the coming months and years. The fundamental re-evaluation required to prevent such a scandal from recurring is too profound to be borne by a resigned society, which only serves to perpetuate the phenomenon. As anthropologist Pascal Boyer argues in his book L’impossible Démocratie, there is a distinction between so-called cooperative Western cultures and ‘coalitional’ groups—those characterised by a tribal mentality. The latter operate with a predatory mindset, interpreting leniency, tolerance, and goodwill as signs of weakness. The failure of public authorities to act in the face of the excesses of people of immigrant origin is, for them, nothing but a tremendous encouragement to go even further.
France Celebrates Champions League Victory: A Defeat for Civilisation
PSG players celebrate with the trophy at Parc des Princes stadium, in Paris on May 31, 2026, during a special event organised to celebrate with supporters their victory over Arsenal FC in the UEFA Champions League final.
FRANCK FIFE / POOL / AFP
You may also like
When ‘White Racism’ Trumps Black Murder
The more crime non-whites commit, the more ‘systemically racist’ the system is deemed to be. That is a foolish game to play.
100 years of Portugal’s National Revolution
One hundred years ago, a crumbling nation took hold of its destiny, restored trust in politics, and called on the Right and the patriotic Left to join hands in a grand project of national salvation.
Independence Before Identity—Montenegro at Twenty
Montenegro outlasted the Ottoman Empire, the forcible erasure of its statehood in 1918, and decades of communist Yugoslavia, but will it be able to outlast the European Union?
In line with the scenario anticipated by the authorities, PSG’s victory in the Champions League final led to scenes of rare violence in Paris and across France. The images circulating on social media paint a picture of a situation spiralling out of control, a fact borne out by the official figures on police interventions. Yet politicians from the Left to the centre are seeking at all costs to downplay the situation, whilst fundamental questions arise: are we still at the stage of mere ‘disturbance of public order,’ or are we facing a collapse of civilisation?
The Champions League final pitted the French team Paris Saint-Germain against the English team Arsenal. While the match took place in Budapest in a relatively calm atmosphere, in Paris, residents held their breath and holed up in their homes. Families instructed children and teenagers to stay at home—there was no question of risking a trip to a café to watch the match, at the risk of getting into trouble.
PSG claimed victory once again, but the outcome was far from glorious. Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez reported a sharp rise in violence. Over 890 arrests were recorded, and 178 police officers and gendarmes were injured. Two deaths have been reported. Speaking on France Inter radio on Monday, June 1st, he stated that these figures were “up by more than 45%” compared to 2025.
In the heart of Paris, at the Opéra Bastille, audience members attending a performance were confined inside after the show, as security staff deemed that conditions on the street were not safe enough to allow them to leave the building. At the Trocadéro, a stone’s throw from the Eiffel Tower, rioters shouted “Bin Laden” while dressed in outfits imitating the terrorist. Online, accounts are flooding in and converging, such as that of this distraught firefighter:
Elon Musk himself shared a glimpse of this violence on his X account.
The images circulated by individuals and alternative sites leave little doubt about the frenzied atmosphere that reigned over the city.
8,000 police officers were deployed in Paris alone. Among left-wing figures, denial of reality is rife, for quite understandable reasons: it is ideologically unthinkable to ‘stigmatise’ those responsible, their own voters. The obvious scapegoat is the police, accused of having cracked down indiscriminately or, at the very least, of not having allowed the supporters to ‘express their joy.’ In the centre and in the mainstream press, the narrative is the same. Despite the alarming figures, the minister refuses to use the term ‘chaos.’ The rolling news channel BFM TV simply referred to “a few tensions.”
Denial of reality has become systematic, echoed at the highest levels, as a police officer from the Paris region confided to Valeurs actuelles:
This is confirmed in his analysis by RN MP Matthias Renault: the rioters act this way because they have no fear, either of physical consequences or of legal or financial repercussions.
The French have been forced to adapt and get used to the wave of violence that now inevitably accompanies major football competitions.
For it is not ‘sport’ in general that is at issue here. The Rugby World Cup did not give rise to such madness, nor did the swimming competitions during the Olympic Games. This is a problem specific to football, which can be explained by the role immigration has come to play in the sport—at all levels. In regional clubs, ‘white’ players, or those of French descent, are now in the minority, to the extent that some parents are reluctant to let their children join teams where they will not be welcome. In the public sphere, few dare to speak out against this scandal, which is being endured in silence. At a higher level, players in local teams have only a very tenuous attachment to France, and many hold dual nationality with a country in sub-Saharan Africa or the Maghreb, as was implicitly demonstrated by the composition of the teams during the Africa Cup of Nations: a majority of African players with French nationality—or the reverse. The prestigious Paris Saint-Germain club, which headlined Saturday’s match, is owned by Qatar, which is advancing its agenda through football and maintains murky ties with the Muslim Brotherhood.
A few symbolic facts provide a key to understanding that some refuse to see. For instance, the son of the raï singer Khaled was photographed climbing onto the statue of Joan of Arc near the Louvre, to insult France in no uncertain terms—this is an example of a scene of ‘jubilation’ praised by the press. In his case, we are not dealing with a young man from a ‘deprived’ neighbourhood. Rather, this behaviour is symbolic of a youth that has learnt to hate France and which sees in the triumph of PSG—owned by Qatar and featuring North African and African star players—‘its’ triumph, the triumph of a France that has been replaced.
Given the political patterns currently in force, there is no reason why the situation should improve in the coming months and years. The fundamental re-evaluation required to prevent such a scandal from recurring is too profound to be borne by a resigned society, which only serves to perpetuate the phenomenon. As anthropologist Pascal Boyer argues in his book L’impossible Démocratie, there is a distinction between so-called cooperative Western cultures and ‘coalitional’ groups—those characterised by a tribal mentality. The latter operate with a predatory mindset, interpreting leniency, tolerance, and goodwill as signs of weakness. The failure of public authorities to act in the face of the excesses of people of immigrant origin is, for them, nothing but a tremendous encouragement to go even further.
Our community starts with you
READ NEXT
Remigration: Aimless or Soulless? The Italian Debate
Saving ‘The Thread of History’
Péter Magyar’s Brussels Illusion: The Victory That Brings No Money Home