Skip to content
Search
Close
SHOP
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Commentary
  • Essays
  • Interviews
  • Reviews
  • Tributes
  • Media
Menu
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Commentary
  • Essays
  • Interviews
  • Reviews
  • Tributes
  • Media
  • NEWS

Musk to Toe the Line on EU Rules for Online Communications

In a video message, together with EU Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton, Musk declared they had a “great discussion” and that the EU is “exactly aligned with my thinking.”
  • Tristan Vanheuckelom
  • — May 13, 2022
In a video message, together with EU Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton, Musk declared they had a “great discussion” and that the EU is “exactly aligned with my thinking.”
  • Tristan Vanheuckelom
  • — May 13, 2022

Elon Musk will comply with the EU’s Digital Services Act when he gains full ownership of Twitter, AP reports. The act, first proposed in December 2020 but yet to be formally approved, would ensure “a safe and accountable online environment” for its citizens, the EU Commission states.

The assent from Musk came last Monday, after having met with EU Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton. That same day, Breton posted a tweet, containing a video message from him and Musk, in which the latter declared they had a “great discussion” and that the act is “exactly aligned with my thinking.”

Today @elonmusk and I wanted to share a quick message with you on platform regulation 🇪🇺#DSA pic.twitter.com/nvP5FEXECY

— Thierry Breton (@ThierryBreton) May 9, 2022

Afterwards, Breton went on to tell AP that the Musk meeting served to inform the world’s wealthiest man of the balance the EU seeks to strike between free speech and making sure that whatever is illegal “will be forbidden in the digital space.” The Digital Services Act has come under criticism for its vagueness over what constitutes “hate speech” and “disinformation”—skeptics predict that a liberal interpretation of these terms could justify the silencing of political dissent. 

It is unclear how Musk’s Tuesday announcement to reinstate former president Donald J. Trump’s Twitter account would be handled by regulatory bodies. Nor is it certain whether Trump would actually return to the platform, as he had previously told Fox News he would not, preferring instead to make use of his own social media app ‘Truth Social.’

Musk drew fire from various government bodies as soon as Twitter’s board of directors unanimously accepted his buyout offer of $44 billion on April 25th. A shot across the bow came from both the EU and the UK over the billionaire’s vision of Twitter being a “digital town square” (guided by his self-professed “free speech absolutism”).

Be it cars or social media, any company operating in Europe needs to comply with our rules – regardless of their shareholding.

Mr Musk knows this well.

He is familiar with European rules on automotive, and will quickly adapt to the Digital Services Act.#DSA

— Thierry Breton (@ThierryBreton) April 26, 2022

Il y a des choses intéressantes dans ce qu’@elonmusk veut impulser pour @Twitter, mais rappelons que le #DigitalServicesAct – et donc l’obligation de lutter contre la désinformation, la haine en ligne, etc. – s’appliquera quelle que soit l’idéologie de son propriétaire. #PFUE2022

— Cédric O (@cedric_o) April 25, 2022

Subsequently, a UK government spokesperson told CNBC that the country is “introducing new online safety laws to safeguard children, prevent abusive behavior and protect free speech,” and that “all tech firms with users in the UK will need to comply with the new laws or face hefty fines and having their sites blocked.” The legislation, known simply as the Online Safety Bill, is yet to be approved by UK lawmakers. If passed, it would allow for jail time for company executives of platforms (such as Twitter) over serious violations. Further penalties would include fines up to 10% of annual global sales as well.

Meanwhile, on the American front, a few days after the news, the formation of a Disinformation Governance Board was announced. Run under the auspices of the Department of Homeland Security, the board’s purpose—at least ostensibly—is to erect barriers to disinformation from Russia being shared online and combat misleading information circulated by human smugglers. It is headed by “disinformation expert” Nina Jankowicz, who quickly gained notoriety not for her credentials, but for her love of musical and cabaret song performances—among which is a Mary Poppins song, repurposed for political commentary. 

@paultarsus1611

Nina Jankowicz now the head of DHS Disinformation Governance Board/Ministry of Truth. #MinistryofTruth #Biden #joeblowsgoats #idiot #lgbfjb

♬ original sound – paultarsus1611

Considering the timing of the announcement, some fear the scope of the board is far more extensive, however. While a DHS spokesperson said that the department had begun its work on disinformation several years ago, and that the government body was created “to ensure this work does not infringe on the fundamental right of free speech and to further protect privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties,” Missouri’s U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R.) sees it as a flagrant attack on the right to free speech, codified in the First Amendment. 

The Administration that activated the FBI against parents at school board meetings now has created a government Disinformation Board to monitor all Americans’ speech. It’s a disgrace. Joe Biden & Secretary Mayorkas: dissolve this monstrosity immediately pic.twitter.com/hSnMpREizI

— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) April 28, 2022

On May 4th, he introduced a bill that would immediately dissolve the DHS, whilst unseating its director.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Hawley said:

[American president] Biden’s so-called Disinformation Board is unconstitutional and must be dissolved immediately. This is nothing short of a censorship committee vested with the full powers of the federal government to monitor dissenting speech and opposing viewpoints under the guise of national security. The American people need a full accounting of who signed off on this Board and who approved such a radical, anti-free speech activist to lead it.

Tristan Vanheuckelom is a Belgian journalist who writes for The European Conservative. A book and film reviewer for various Dutch-language publications, his other interests include history, political science, and theology.
  • Tags: Digital Services Act, Elon Musk, free speech, Online Safety Bill, Thierry Breton, Twitter

READ NEXT

UK Welcome To Rejoin EU at “Any Time” as Brussels Officials “Dream” of Bloc Expansion

Michael Curzon February 8, 2023

Reconquête MEP Stripped of Parliamentary Immunity Over Accusations of ‘Hate Speech’

Robert Semonsen February 8, 2023

Germany Considering Withdrawing From Mali Earlier Than Expected

Thomas O'Reilly February 8, 2023

IMPRESSUM

SUBSCRIPTION

LOG IN

PRIVACY POLICY

CONTACT

[email protected]

© The European Conservative 2023

  • Impressum
  • Privacy Policy
  • General Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Made by DIGITALHERO

Issue 25, Winter 2023

  • News
  • Analysis
  • Commentary
  • Essays
  • Interviews
  • Reviews
  • Tributes
  • Media
Menu
  • News
  • Analysis
  • Commentary
  • Essays
  • Interviews
  • Reviews
  • Tributes
  • Media
Search

About

SHOP

JOBS & VACANCIES

Login