On Tuesday, the Scottish Parliament voted to reject a bill to legalize assisted suicide in a 69-57 vote, with one abstention. The failure of the suicide bill comes after a massive push by euthanasia campaigners to shepherd the legislation across the finish line; just days ago, sponsoring MSP Liam McArthur insisted that the bill was “bullet-proof” after 175 amendments were accepted during the final week of deliberations.
This is the second major loss for suicide campaigners in less than six months, with another significant defeat likely looming. On November 23, Slovenia’s assisted suicide law was overturned by national referendum after a stunning campaign reversed public opinion in less than two months—53% of those who participated voted against assisted suicide. Meanwhile, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater’s assisted suicide bill is tied up in the House of Lords, with over 1,200 amendments tabled and time running out.
Assisted suicide—always referred to by soothingly Orwellian phrases such as “medical assistance in dying”—is broadly popular according to polling in most Western countries. Suicide groups and their political allies quote these data relentlessly. But over the past decade, an indisputable case study has loomed large over the debate: Canada.
In 2016, Canada legalized assisted suicide for adults with “enduring and intolerable suffering” and a “reasonably foreseeable death.” But safeguard after safeguard was torn down by the House of Commons and the courts; in 2021, assisted suicide was legalized for those struggling with mental illness (a law to stop this practice is being debated in Parliament). Canada is on track for 100,000 euthanasia deaths by this summer and has become an international cautionary tale.
Scottish MSPs who voted against the bill cited Canada’s grim expansions —which have been condemned by the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities—as one of their key fears. Canada was cited by the Church of Scotland in its opposition to the bill. Inclusion Scotland, one of the disability rights organizations opposing the bill, noted that “in Canada … we note with concern that there has been divestment in palliative care facilities in favour of medical assistance to die.”
The Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh noted in a statement (quoted in an open letter signed by a range of Scottish luminaries and published in The Herald) that the Canadian example exposes the likelihood of future expansion:
The College is very concerned to note the speed with which Canada has moved from legislation similar to the proposed Assisted Dying Bill to legislation which allows euthanasia by lethal injection for individuals irrespective of capacity and irrespective of terminal illness.
Scottish MSPs heard horror stories directly from Canadians. Last spring, Alicia Duncan of British Columbia traveled to Scotland to tell her mother’s story. In 2020, Donna Duncan suffered a concussion after a car accident; her mental health suffered, and her daughters found out she was scheduled for assisted suicide in October 2021, just two days before she was scheduled to be killed. They managed to commit her to a psychiatric ward, but after forty-eight hours, Donna was assessed again and killed four hours later.
Because Donna had been starving herself, she was determined to have a “reasonably foreseeable death” and thus be in the same category as someone who was terminally ill. “The Scottish bill echoed many of these same standards, and in some areas appeared even weaker,” Duncan told me. “Safeguards that appear clear on paper can become dangerously subjective in practice, particularly for vulnerable people.”
MSPs were horrified by her story. “It was a very emotional meeting,” she told me. “They were shocked, and very grateful for my testimony. One MSP and I spoke of her concerns about coercion, which I had also emphasized. Another had tears in her eyes as I spoke. It’s one thing to look at a bill, but it is another to hear the real-life implications and the trauma it can cause others.” Alicia Duncan was diagnosed with PTSD after her mother’s death.
Suicide campaigners in Scotland faced pushback from across civil society. Organizations raising concerns about the bill or opposing outright included the Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland, the Royal College of GPs Scotland, the Association for Palliative Medicine, the British Geriatrics Society, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, the Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, Alzheimer Scotland, and the Glasgow Disability Alliance, among others.
The failure of Scotland’s suicide bill is significant. Scotland is very secular and notoriously progressive. But with incontrovertible case studies illustrating where suicide regimes inevitably lead—Canada being the most prominent among them—resistance to assisted suicide bills has stiffened as politicians are forced to confront the consequences of their votes. Suicide campaigners who countenance safeguards because they see new laws as merely a first step to a more permissive euthanasia regime are seeing their soothing lies confronted with cold hard truths and mounting corpse counts.
Thank God that MSPs in Scotland and voters in Slovenia saw that clearly. Now, it is time for the House of Lords to terminate Kim Leadbeater’s deadly bill. A defeat for the suicide campaigners is a victory for the vulnerable.
A Defeat for Suicide Campaigners Is a Victory for the Vulnerable
Erubiel Flores from Pixabay
You may also like
Iran’s Underground Church in Wartime
Amid harsh persecution and an internet blackout, Iran’s house-church movement continues to grow as believers preach, serve their communities, and face intensified state crackdowns.
Leo XIV Recognises Another 49 Catholic Martyrs of the Spanish Civil War
The timing of the new recognitions suggests Leo is paying attention to what is happening in Spain—and signalling that neither the anti-Catholic abuses of the past nor those of the present will be ignored.
New Portuguese Citizenship Law Is a Start—Remigration Must Follow
Portugal has been denationalised, deconstructed as a national community, and converted into a confusing, shifting ethnic puzzle. This is no longer a recipe for disaster—it is an existing one.
On Tuesday, the Scottish Parliament voted to reject a bill to legalize assisted suicide in a 69-57 vote, with one abstention. The failure of the suicide bill comes after a massive push by euthanasia campaigners to shepherd the legislation across the finish line; just days ago, sponsoring MSP Liam McArthur insisted that the bill was “bullet-proof” after 175 amendments were accepted during the final week of deliberations.
This is the second major loss for suicide campaigners in less than six months, with another significant defeat likely looming. On November 23, Slovenia’s assisted suicide law was overturned by national referendum after a stunning campaign reversed public opinion in less than two months—53% of those who participated voted against assisted suicide. Meanwhile, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater’s assisted suicide bill is tied up in the House of Lords, with over 1,200 amendments tabled and time running out.
Assisted suicide—always referred to by soothingly Orwellian phrases such as “medical assistance in dying”—is broadly popular according to polling in most Western countries. Suicide groups and their political allies quote these data relentlessly. But over the past decade, an indisputable case study has loomed large over the debate: Canada.
In 2016, Canada legalized assisted suicide for adults with “enduring and intolerable suffering” and a “reasonably foreseeable death.” But safeguard after safeguard was torn down by the House of Commons and the courts; in 2021, assisted suicide was legalized for those struggling with mental illness (a law to stop this practice is being debated in Parliament). Canada is on track for 100,000 euthanasia deaths by this summer and has become an international cautionary tale.
Scottish MSPs who voted against the bill cited Canada’s grim expansions —which have been condemned by the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities—as one of their key fears. Canada was cited by the Church of Scotland in its opposition to the bill. Inclusion Scotland, one of the disability rights organizations opposing the bill, noted that “in Canada … we note with concern that there has been divestment in palliative care facilities in favour of medical assistance to die.”
The Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh noted in a statement (quoted in an open letter signed by a range of Scottish luminaries and published in The Herald) that the Canadian example exposes the likelihood of future expansion:
Scottish MSPs heard horror stories directly from Canadians. Last spring, Alicia Duncan of British Columbia traveled to Scotland to tell her mother’s story. In 2020, Donna Duncan suffered a concussion after a car accident; her mental health suffered, and her daughters found out she was scheduled for assisted suicide in October 2021, just two days before she was scheduled to be killed. They managed to commit her to a psychiatric ward, but after forty-eight hours, Donna was assessed again and killed four hours later.
Because Donna had been starving herself, she was determined to have a “reasonably foreseeable death” and thus be in the same category as someone who was terminally ill. “The Scottish bill echoed many of these same standards, and in some areas appeared even weaker,” Duncan told me. “Safeguards that appear clear on paper can become dangerously subjective in practice, particularly for vulnerable people.”
MSPs were horrified by her story. “It was a very emotional meeting,” she told me. “They were shocked, and very grateful for my testimony. One MSP and I spoke of her concerns about coercion, which I had also emphasized. Another had tears in her eyes as I spoke. It’s one thing to look at a bill, but it is another to hear the real-life implications and the trauma it can cause others.” Alicia Duncan was diagnosed with PTSD after her mother’s death.
Suicide campaigners in Scotland faced pushback from across civil society. Organizations raising concerns about the bill or opposing outright included the Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland, the Royal College of GPs Scotland, the Association for Palliative Medicine, the British Geriatrics Society, the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, the Medical and Dental Defence Union of Scotland, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, Alzheimer Scotland, and the Glasgow Disability Alliance, among others.
The failure of Scotland’s suicide bill is significant. Scotland is very secular and notoriously progressive. But with incontrovertible case studies illustrating where suicide regimes inevitably lead—Canada being the most prominent among them—resistance to assisted suicide bills has stiffened as politicians are forced to confront the consequences of their votes. Suicide campaigners who countenance safeguards because they see new laws as merely a first step to a more permissive euthanasia regime are seeing their soothing lies confronted with cold hard truths and mounting corpse counts.
Thank God that MSPs in Scotland and voters in Slovenia saw that clearly. Now, it is time for the House of Lords to terminate Kim Leadbeater’s deadly bill. A defeat for the suicide campaigners is a victory for the vulnerable.
Our community starts with you
READ NEXT
The Second English Revolution
New Portuguese Citizenship Law Is a Start—Remigration Must Follow
The ‘Lovely Month of May’: France’s Ceremonies Become Political Battlegrounds