Think Tank Seeks to Avert New Nuclear Arms Race

The end of New START poses new threats—which experts claim can be micromanaged safely in the absence of grand treaties.

You may also like

A decommissioned Titan II ICBM at the Titan Missile Museum, Green Valley, Sahuarita, Arizona.

The end of New START poses new threats—which experts claim can be micromanaged safely in the absence of grand treaties.

A new research paper suggests that nuclear stability can be achieved through strategic stability dialogues and transparency measures—even while admitting that a comprehensive legally binding agreement between the U.S., Russia, and China is currently a political impossibility, 

Avoiding a New Nuclear Arms Race: How policymakers and experts can revitalize arms control for a new era argues that by focusing on neutral domains like space, and updating bilateral notification agreements, the N5 (P5) powers can avoid an accidental slide into the “Lawless Era” of a multi-party arms race. With the nuclear rearmament officially underway following the expiration of the treaty named New START, the 2026 Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference is shifting focus from grand treaties to incremental diplomacy.

According to the Chatham House-supported authors, the goal for 2026 is simple yet urgent: prevent a total collapse of the NPT by instead securing a minimum statement of support from all five nuclear powers. Rather than emphasise disarmament, the report seeks to establish the ‘traffic rules’ for an increasingly crowded and dangerous atomic highway.

Leave a Reply

Our community starts with you

Subscribe to any plan available in our store to comment, connect and be part of the conversation!